Search results

Yes the discussion was not that easy to follow anymore. I agree with you that this is a bug, it is reflecting the wrong context for the FIRECalc results. I am a bit surprised that this bug which should be easy to fix is already in for 6 years? Good example! I am learning a lot of new things of...

It was not my intention to ague :peace: Yes I tried a lot of different options. With a spending amount of 39K it would still result in a portfolio balance of 300k. But now I understand the phrasing FIRECalc uses is a bit unlucky.

Ah now I understand! Thank you!. I already tried so many different ways and even with 39k spending's a year it would result in the same 300k. That Investigate tab is an interesting functionality, I wasn't aware of that. I wouldn't dare to ask ;). I am already happy that there is a tool like...

I am a bit confused. You are mentioning the starting portfolio amount but I thought FIRECalc was proving the lowest portfolio balance at the end of the retirement (so after the 55 years). At least the text indicates that:"The lowest and highest portfolio balance at the end of your retirement...

In the FIRECalc results the lowest portfolio amount at the and of my retirement is the same amount as I entered as Portfolio under 'Start Here'. I assume I am doing something wrong? I entered the following figures. Start Here Spending: 36000 Portfolio: 300000 Full Years: 55 Other Income/...