|
|
04-25-2006, 01:02 PM
|
#1
|
Dryer sheet aficionado
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 27
|
The Number
Read an article about the the book titled "The Number" by Lee Eisenberg.* It appears that if you want to be comfortable 'but not rich', you'll need a minimum of $1 to $2 million.* $2 to $5 million will put you at a higher comfort level.* $5 to $10 mill categorizes you as rich, while $10 milliion+ puts you as ultra rich.
I think the majority of people on this forum wouldn't make it on Lee's radar as comfortable.....so are we in trouble?* Are we just fooling ourselves and in denial that 'things will truly work out'?*
Lee Eisenberg's book is causing angst!
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
04-25-2006, 01:10 PM
|
#2
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 325
|
Re: The Number
Can u go into more detail in what he means by 'comfortable' vs. 'higher comfort level'?
|
|
|
04-25-2006, 01:19 PM
|
#3
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chattanooga
Posts: 3,878
|
Re: The Number
__________________
Earning money is an action, saving money is a behavior, growing money takes a well diversified portfolio and the discipline to ignore market swings.
|
|
|
04-25-2006, 01:21 PM
|
#4
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,505
|
Re: The Number
Quote:
I think the majority of people on this forum wouldn't make it on Lee's radar as comfortable.....so are we in trouble?
|
I see you have one post but you spoke as if you've been following the boards. *Assuming that's the case, do you not remember the net worth polls that were conducted a while back? * Seems like i remember the average person was reporting over a million in net worth, and several were reporting being multi-millionaires.
|
|
|
04-25-2006, 01:23 PM
|
#5
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas: No Country for Old Men
Posts: 50,004
|
Re: The Number
__________________
Numbers is hard
|
|
|
04-25-2006, 01:23 PM
|
#6
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,005
|
Re: The Number
I plan on having "1-2 million" when I ER. I think that would make me comfortably rich.
|
|
|
04-25-2006, 03:37 PM
|
#7
|
Dryer sheet aficionado
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 27
|
Re: The Number
Quote:
Originally Posted by CybrMike
Can u go into more detail in what he means by 'comfortable' vs. 'higher comfort level'?
|
the article says "Comfortable" are people who scale back when they retire, dine and travel modestly, yet still have a nice life.
"Comfortable Plus" in the $2 to $5 million range are those with upgraded amenities, membership in a mid-priced club, maybe they get to keep their small second home.
"Kind of Rich" or $7 to $10 million are people who like to put on the Ritz, stay at the Four Seasons, shuttle between a couple of expensive hopes.
"Rich" or $10 million + are those who can afford to spend weeks abroad, belong to a gated golf community, charter jets.
ALSO....I am not a spammer. Just finally wanted to post something. I don't get to read alot of the posts, just started here and there. Only thing that I have found however is there are alot of people here who have slightly negative attitudes. Is there anything wrong with being financial well off as in the categories above AND down to earth too? Don't have to stereotype the well off.
Just some thoughts.....
|
|
|
04-25-2006, 03:39 PM
|
#8
|
Dryer sheet aficionado
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 27
|
Re: The Number
Quote:
Originally Posted by Azanon
I see you have one post but you spoke as if you've been following the boards. *Assuming that's the case, do you not remember the net worth polls that were conducted a while back? * Seems like i remember the average person was reporting over a million in net worth, and several were reporting being multi-millionaires.
|
How do you search or find the Net Worth Polls as per above as I have not come across this. Sorry for the question, bu I am pretty new at this.
|
|
|
04-25-2006, 03:52 PM
|
#9
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,155
|
Re: The Number
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canadian Girl
Read an article about the the book titled "The Number" by Lee Eisenberg.* It appears that if you want to be comfortable 'but not rich', you'll need a minimum of $1 to $2 million.* $2 to $5 million will put you at a higher comfort level.* $5 to $10 mill categorizes you as rich, while $10 milliion+ puts you as ultra rich.
I think the majority of people on this forum wouldn't make it on Lee's radar as comfortable.....so are we in trouble?* Are we just fooling ourselves and in denial that 'things will truly work out'?*
Lee Eisenberg's book is causing angst!
|
The advantage of being older is the ability to decide for oneself what is proper.* If I think 500K is comfortable for me, then it is.* I don't need Lee to tell me that.* Conversely, if I think 4 million is not enough, then so be it.
I haven't read Eisenberg's book, but I know for sure his arbitrary definitions does not apply to me.
Sam
|
|
|
04-25-2006, 03:58 PM
|
#10
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 84
|
Re: The Number
Quote:
How do you search or find the Net Worth Polls as per above as I have not come across this. Sorry for the question, bu I am pretty new at this.
|
Here are a couple of links:
2006 ER Forum Current Net Worth Survey
Part 2: Watcha worth?
For future reference, simply go to the search function at the top of the page and type in whatever it is you are searching for. In this case: "net worth"
Quote:
The advantage of being older is the ability to decide for oneself what is proper. If I think 500K is comfortable for me, then it is. I don't need Lee to tell me that. Conversely, if I think 4 million is not enough, then so be it.
I haven't read Eisenberg's book, but I know for sure his arbitrary definitions does not apply to me.
|
That's exactly what I was thinking. If your desire is to ER, you'd better know what your expenses (everything: COL, taxes, health care, travel...) will be in retirement. Once you know that, how much you need in investments is simply expenses*25, with maybe a little padding for "comfort".
__________________
"The one who creates does not wait for an opportunity, blaming circumstances, the fates, and the gods. He seizes opportunities or creates them with the magic wand of his will, effort, and searching discrimination"<br />-Yogananda
|
|
|
04-25-2006, 04:03 PM
|
#11
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,670
|
Re: The Number
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canadian Girl
Read an article about the the book titled "The Number" by Lee Eisenberg.* It appears that if you want to be comfortable 'but not rich', you'll need a minimum of $1 to $2 million.* $2 to $5 million will put you at a higher comfort level.* $5 to $10 mill categorizes you as rich, while $10 milliion+ puts you as ultra rich.
I think the majority of people on this forum wouldn't make it on Lee's radar as comfortable.....so are we in trouble?* Are we just fooling ourselves and in denial that 'things will truly work out'?*
Lee Eisenberg's book is causing angst!
|
Those figures look about right to me. *$1-$2mil would give you $40K to $80K of income. *That average would work for me and I expect to live comfortably in retirement, but not extravacantly. *Good food, health care provisions, a car, some travel, and other basic living provisions are all I am looking for. *I'm guessing $50K to $60K in today's dollars should do it.
From what others have posted in this forum, I may be in the middle of the pack with my numbers, so I don't think anyone is in "trouble" here and "angst" might be too strong of a word for someone who has done proper ER planning.
__________________
No man is free who is not master of himself. --- Epictetus
Enjoy Yourself (It's Later Than You Think). --- Guy Lombardo
|
|
|
04-25-2006, 04:09 PM
|
#12
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 13,151
|
Re: The Number
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canadian Girl
I think the majority of people on this forum wouldn't make it on Lee's radar as comfortable.....so are we in trouble?* Are we just fooling ourselves and in denial that 'things will truly work out'?*
|
Well I don't know about that Canadian Girl.* $1 mil X 4% = $40K.* From what I've been reading here, there aren't very many posting that don't have or aren't planning to have $40K income in retirement.* I sure am.
What makes you feel that the majority of people on this forum aren't planning on having $40K income in retirement?
__________________
"I wasn't born blue blood. I was born blue-collar." John Wort Hannam
|
|
|
04-25-2006, 04:22 PM
|
#13
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,375
|
Re: The Number
There's $40k and there's $40k (or even $400k). Some of us have pensions or other deferred compensation in addition to The Number--and some don't, some have subsidized health insurance and some don't, some have dependent children (or parents) or other special expenses, some have a mortgage. Some live in a pricy house and could trade down in future, others already traded down (or never traded up ;-). Some do a little work for pay on the side. Basically, one size doesn't fit all.
__________________
You can't always get what you want, but if you try sometimes, you might find you get what you need.
|
|
|
04-26-2006, 07:18 AM
|
#14
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 113
|
Re: The Number
Quote:
Originally Posted by astromeria
Basically, one size doesn't fit all.
|
I think I could fit very well into $1 billion and suspect that everyone on this board could be likewise. Anyone care to put me to the test?
__________________
Robert<br />https://www.austinexplorer.com/<br />https://www.texashiking.com/
|
|
|
04-26-2006, 08:08 AM
|
#15
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: minnesota
Posts: 13,228
|
Re: The Number
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canadian Girl
I don't get to read alot of the posts, just started here and there. Only thing that I have found however is there are alot of people here who have slightly negative attitudes. Is there anything wrong with being financial well off as in the categories above AND down to earth too? Don't have to stereotype the well off.
Just some thoughts.....
|
I am curious. Negative attitudes about what? I am not sure where you are coming from here.
__________________
.
No more lawyer stuff, no more political stuff, so no more CYA
|
|
|
04-26-2006, 08:19 AM
|
#16
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 7,968
|
Re: The Number
Martha
In my lucky 13th year of ER - I have an extreme negative attitude toward W**K!
IN THEORY - after Katrina some W*** would have recouped the losses and brought my portfolio back to snuff.
IN PRACTICE - SCREW W**K!!!!!!!!
Can't even bring myself to say the word.
heh heh heh
|
|
|
04-26-2006, 09:06 AM
|
#17
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,505
|
Re: The Number
Being rich is about 15% monetary and 85% state of mind.* *Even when i was a "poor" college student with a work study, i felt rich.* *I just focused on all of my potential and the opportunities before me.* *I dont remember ever feeling poor, so IMHO, i dont believe i ever was poor.*
|
|
|
04-26-2006, 11:49 AM
|
#18
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 880
|
Re: The Number
I read the article and the book. It was an entertaining read. I believe the point the book was trying to make is to get folks to think about what "their number is" and to plan accordingly. It was clear from many of his interviews that many people aren't thinking about it and they are uncomfortable even discussing it. I enjoyed the book and it didn't cause me any angst...just reinforced the need for clear thinking and good planning.
__________________
"Tell me, what is it you plan to do with your one wild and precious life?" - Mary Oliver
|
|
|
04-26-2006, 12:20 PM
|
#19
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,005
|
Re: The Number
Quote:
Originally Posted by Azanon
Being rich is about 15% monetary and 85% state of mind. Even when i was a "poor" college student with a work study, i felt rich.
|
That's just what poor people keep telling themselves!
|
|
|
04-26-2006, 01:27 PM
|
#20
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 190
|
Re: The Number
Don't want to turn things into an SWR debate, but whenever 4% gets too much attention in discussion I wonder if it might not be wise to recognize that 4% means zero Social Security in your 60's.
If you believe you will get at least something from SS, that 4% number is simply "wrong" for the risks being assessed and built into it. It would certainly seem that some non-zero magnitude of SS, for non-government workers, should be the norm.
Firecalc says even modest SS magnitudes take things to 5ish%. I understand the desire to be conservative, but after you've been pessimistic about health care expenses and ignoring a ramp down in overall expenditures as you age past 70, throwing in a presumption of zero SS seems quite a bit extreme.
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|