Restaurant adding fee for use of credit card

Resturant owners I have known open admitted to me that they pocketed $100 cash every night.
So you have taken a statistically significant sample of all the restaurants in the world? In the US? How many restaurants? Really, it's a silly and indefensible statement.
 
More and more restaurants seem to be adding a fee if you use your credit card. I've seen this be upwards of 3%. I know that the CC companies charge a transaction fee, but it just seems wrong to be passing this on to the consumer. I don't like carrying extra cash. And it is much easier to track spending by categories when using a CC. Is anybody using their debit cards instead which usually does not incur the extra fee?
We like paying in cash, and haven't used a CC at a restaurant in decades. So, actually we had no idea this was going on. Sounds inconvenient for CC users!
 
Resturant owners I have known open admitted to me that they pocketed $100 cash every night.
This doesn't surprise me. I would be more surprised if there wasn't cash taken under the table.
I expect a lot of the waiters/waitress prefer cash tips, for that reason.
Maybe that's something that should be figured into the tip factor - 10% vs 15% vs 20%. Tip less with cash.
 
If I run into a fee that is higher than my cash back I will use my debit card.
 
You don't have the same protections as you do with a CC.
Exactly. No debit card usage for me except ATM cash withdrawals and not many of those either, since I get paid in cash for the lessons I provide.
 
You don't have the same protections as you do with a CC.
Good enough for me: "We offer you this simple guarantee: Schwab will cover losses in any of your Schwab accounts due to unauthorized activity.
 
This doesn't surprise me. I would be more surprised if there wasn't cash taken under the table.
Cash under the table, food taken home expensed to the restaurant, meals eaten at the restaurant that don't get recorded, etc. There are a lot of ways for restaurant owners to game the system if they choose.
 
Well, gas stations typically have the most well-advertised differential between CC pricing and cash/debit card pricing, so usually it's better to pay with a debit card (or cash). For example, the Citgo down the road from me here in suburban metro Atlanta has a cash/debit price of $3.29/gal and a CC price of $3.34/gal. The differential is usually between 5 and 10¢/gal. However, I still pay for gas with my Silver Business AmEx, since it gives me 3% cash back on gasoline purchases, which works out to about 10¢/gal these days (and thus completely makes up for the CC pricing surcharge).
Putting skimmers at gas stations where you pay at the pump is a big problem here so I will not use a debit card. I also get 3% back on my credit card.
 
Seems to me that the early pitch in enticing restaurants into accepting credit cards in the first place is that people would spend more. And I believe they do...a lot more.

As such, the restaurants are already making more money already with the CCs so why charge more? Having said that, I really don't care.

FWIW, I never, never, ever carry cash. Not even $5. We keep a draw of cash at home for tipping delivery guys but that's it. I'm not about to start lugging around $200-$300 for dinner to save $10.
 
Well, it finally happened. I was at my dermatologist today and they said 3% charge for credit cards or you can use a debit card. They had not told me in advance before I came to the office but I keep a debit card in my wallet that's linked to a checking account that has less than $500 in it for just this kind of thing. So I used that.
 
Seems to me that the early pitch in enticing restaurants into accepting credit cards in the first place is that people would spend more. And I believe they do...a lot more.
I guess that applies to some people. Not me though, the method of paying has no bearing on what I decide to eat.

But there certainly is a demographic that wouldn't go to a restaurant if they had to pay cash or debit only...they just don't have the money.
 
I guess that applies to some people. Not me though, the method of paying has no bearing on what I decide to eat.
I think the idea is that if you only have $200 in your pocket, you'll likely try to spend a bit less than that. But if you had a CC, you'd be more likely to spend $250 on that extra drink or dessert. I suspect that the CC companies have data to back that up.

With prices going up as they have been, I'd hate to be given the choice between reading a menu right-to-left or carrying around $500 cash to be safe.

Quite lame to whip out a calculator while looking at the menu like some hobo, making sure you brought enough money!

Personally, I haven't carried even $5 cash on me in maybe 15 years.
 
Last edited:
I guess that applies to some people. Not me though, the method of paying has no bearing on what I decide to eat.

But there certainly is a demographic that wouldn't go to a restaurant if they had to pay cash or debit only...they just don't have the money.
Seems to me that the early pitch in enticing restaurants into accepting credit cards in the first place is that people would spend more. And I believe they do...a lot more.

As such, the restaurants are already making more money already with the CCs so why charge more? Having said that, I really don't care.

FWIW, I never, never, ever carry cash. Not even $5. We keep a draw of cash at home for tipping delivery guys but that's it. I'm not about to start lugging around $200-$300 for dinner to save $10.
CC companies have done the studies, repeatedly, and they know, yes, the average customer spends more in all categories when using plastic vs. cash. Way more than the fee difference. It's a no-brainer to accept the cards in most categories.

Of course, some exceptions, mainly in the direct consumables (gas, groceries) but anything that has a discretionary angle to it? Yes, the purchase increases.

A mom-and-pop sandwich shop might not benefit from the credit card lift, but a nice sit down restaurant certainly does.
 
CC companies have done the studies, repeatedly, and they know, yes, the average customer spends more in all categories when using plastic vs. cash. Way more than the fee difference. It's a no-brainer to accept the cards in most categories.

Of course, some exceptions, mainly in the direct consumables (gas, groceries) but anything that has a discretionary angle to it? Yes, the purchase increases.

A mom-and-pop sandwich shop might not benefit from the credit card lift, but a nice sit down restaurant certainly does.
+1. We're actually going out tonight for a very special celebration at a notably expensive restaurant. Would I bring $300? $400 $500 $600 in cash? Nah! Amex handles that worry.
 
I think the idea is that if you only have $200 in your pocket, you'll likely try to spend a bit less than that. But if you had a CC, you'd be more likely to spend $250 on that extra drink or dessert. I suspect that the CC companies have data to back that up.

With prices going up as they have been, I'd hate to be given the choice between reading a menu right-to-left or carrying around $500 cash to be safe. Quite lame to whip out a calculator while looking at the menu!

Personally, I haven't carried even $5 cash on me in maybe 15 years.
It has been many years since I looked at the prices on the menu when ordering. And when they bring the check, I just look at the bottom line, round up to the nearest $10, double it and move the decimal point to figure the tip. If, after discussing it with the young wife on the way home, we agree that the experience did not seem worth what we just paid, we'll try someplace different next time. In general, we eat out a lot less than we did when working. Among other things, we have time to cook and cleanup at home and we're not always tired. Additionally, the young wife is a far better cook than most restaurant chefs, our ingredients are usually higher quality and we can certainly enjoy far better wine when we stay home.

As far as a credit card surcharge, it just goes to the general feeling of whether the experience was worth the price. I'm not going to go through the hassle of carrying cash just to get 3% off the bill.
 
Last edited:
But back to my point: As much as I sympathize with the difficulties of operating a restaurant, they are, generally, making a lot more money when people use CCs. As noted, according to several studies, people spend a lot more than when paying cash.

If the world suddenly went to cash in restaurants, their revenue would drop dramatically. With that in mind, while I understand why they'd charge extra for CCs or discount for cash, I think they're double counting.
 
It has been many years since I looked at the prices on the menu when ordering. And when they bring the check, I just look at the bottom line, round up to the nearest $10, double it and move the decimal point.
As someone who's notoriously math-challenged, that's what I do!! (Even then I get it wrong sometimes)
 
I can't help but look at the prices on the menu because they are right there with the selections. If they weren't, I would look for them.

I almost never have any cash on me, but I wouldn't spend extra just because I had a CC, either. I'm still looking out for good deals and avoiding purchasing drinks. I would still generally tip 20% for table service meals since minimum wage for tippers is still below regular minimum wage here, which is much higher than the national minimum.
 
For fine dining I use a CC. I’m taking my son and his wife to a really nice restaurant for his birthday and wouldn’t carry that much cash. But if I’m having lunch out I always have enough cash for that.
 
Back
Top Bottom