MC Rider
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
What about when the buildings reach the end of their useful life? ![Er... what? o_O o_O]()
Nothing lasts forever.
Nothing lasts forever.
I would not bank on it. A local realtor friend of mine said condos would have to drop 70% before the market comes back. Not sure if that is realistic but she has been in the business in Florida for over 25 years. She said very few buyers are even considering condos near the coasts anymore. Town houses are now the go to for those previously looking at condos. Apparently, they are increasing in value at the same pace as SFHs. I am not sure if this is way of the future for multifamily buildings in Florida, but one can thank mismanaging HOAs for the trend.Once these items are complete, we hope prices will rise a bit to recoup our costs upon sale.
I did say “hope.” Nobody knows the future, so I don’t make decisions on financial matters, especially from Realtors who would benefit from panic sellers.I would not bank on it. A local realtor friend of mine said condos would have to drop 70% before the market comes back. Not sure if that is realistic but she has been in the business in Florida for over 25 years. She said very few buyers are even considering condos near the coasts anymore. Town houses are now the go to for those previously looking at condos. Apparently, they are increasing in value at the same pace as SFHs. I am not sure if this is way of the future for multifamily buildings in Florida, but one can thank mismanaging HOAs for the trend.
+1. Very true.If SFH homeowners had to account for depreciation and deferred maintenance most would also likely be underfunded... it's just more visible for HOAs.
Our is same, one payment for master (covers mostly the cable and internet discounted package), one for our own community (managed separate from the master) that covers maintenance (lawn/fertilizer of yards, painting of buildings, etc) and one for the clubhouse (pool, courts, etc). And we also enjoy a CDD for the operating expenses of the guard and gates for the broader community. Each has their own assets and responsibilities.It's not unusual to have multiple HOAs or condo associations for a single property. One for your specific building(s) and another master association for the community that covers ammenities like pools, clubhouses, etc.
For many large condo high rise buildings, that was exactly what they were doing. And ended up collapsing to the ground which sparked the legislation.That is the hard part. The increasing cost of maintenance and periodic replacements are difficult for some people on fixed incomes. If they are in a SFH they can just ignore it and run the place into the ground, but that option isn't available in a condo.
I remember seeing photos of the interior of some units in the building that collapsed. They were very plush. To bad fancy window treatments, flooring, and accessories don't hold the building up.For many large condo high rise buildings, that was exactly what they were doing. And ended up collapsing to the ground which sparked the legislation.
I did say “hope.” Nobody knows the future, so I don’t make decisions on financial matters, especially from Realtors who would benefit from panic sellers.
Insurers are crippling the single family home and townhome markets.
Some say developers will start buying out owners of old condos to tear down and build new luxury condos. Who knows what will happen? Fortunately we didn’t buy it as an investment and if we have to sell it at a loss, we can absorb it. A 1940 SFH we bought at the Jersey Shore in 2017 has doubled in value. You win some and you lose some. But I do love warm winters in Florida.
Time will tell. There is a lot of appeal for a condo, especially for those interested in a "lock and leave" 2nd home. Maybe condos won't be as good as a retirement home for the next several years.I would not bank on it. A local realtor friend of mine said condos would have to drop 70% before the market comes back. Not sure if that is realistic but she has been in the business in Florida for over 25 years. She said very few buyers are even considering condos near the coasts anymore. Town houses are now the go to for those previously looking at condos. Apparently, they are increasing in value at the same pace as SFHs. I am not sure if this is way of the future for multifamily buildings in Florida, but one can thank mismanaging HOAs for the trend.
It already has happened.... it is just that condo owners have not gotten the memo yet... eventually they will...I would not bank on it. A local realtor friend of mine said condos would have to drop 70% before the market comes back. Not sure if that is realistic but she has been in the business in Florida for over 25 years. She said very few buyers are even considering condos near the coasts anymore. Town houses are now the go to for those previously looking at condos. Apparently, they are increasing in value at the same pace as SFHs. I am not sure if this is way of the future for multifamily buildings in Florida, but one can thank mismanaging HOAs for the trend.
We have lived in our home for 40 years and paid it off about 25+ years ago. Estimated value is 26x what we paid but only because of the lot being 2 blocks from the ocean here in NE Florida. The house is probably not worth more than 1/5 of the estimated value. I declined hurricane insurance a year ago because of the increase. We still have Home Owners and Flood insurance. If it blew away we would still be ahead of the game. The only thing I would regret is losing a few sentimental items but that would happen whether we had insurance or not.I can understand the concern, after the catastrophic collapse of the Champlain Towers. That was shocking. But gee, I can also understand that people have budgets and that the costs of condo ownership are becoming insanely high in some places. My guess is that many, like you (Tekward) will have second thoughts about Florida condo ownership now.
Here in New Orleans we have been hit by huge insurance increases on single family homes, which Frank and I can (barely) handle for now. But many others with paid off homes like ours, are choosing to go without insurance because they can't afford it. Scary situation IMO. Maybe there will be a rush to rural locations in sparsely populated states with low insurance rates. Or, maybe there are other solutions that I haven't thought of.
In the words of the Monty Python crew; "RUN AWAY!"I was looking at a condo for investment but a realtor told me the HOA would only divulge if they met requirements for FHA financing. No other details from their books would be available until after an offer was made. That seems to be a flaw in the sales process.
Having served on our Board and served as Treasurer, totally true... in fact I used that exact same phrase for a couple of our Board members.One fundamental problem is that most board members get zero training, don't know what they don't know, and are not willing to learn.
Alarmingly, this is true for almost all BoDs, including the public ones with highly compensated directors.Having served on our Board and served as Treasurer, totally true... in fact I used that exact same phrase for a couple of our Board members.
It depends on what the HOA is responsible for. If it is maintaining the common grounds, arranging trash pickup, and making sure the neighbors don't leave a car engine hanging from a tree on their front lawn, that's manageable. In our current neighborhood, that would be very desirable.Something something about a rock and a hard place.
My solution? Don't buy a condo. Or anything with an HOA.![]()
Given the quality of a lot of 1970s and early '80s frame construction, this is a real issue.What about when the buildings reach the end of their useful life?
Nothing lasts forever.
Given the quality of a lot of 1970s and early '80s frame construction, this is a real issue.
There are a lot of older condos in the Maryland suburbs where poorer owners can't afford the major renovations required. IIRC, at least one such condo has voted to dissolve and sell their building for redevelopment.
In an older suburban or urban area that can now support higher-density redevelopment, it's a reasonable choice.Interesting article. I suppose that is one of the few ways to solve the problem, sell the whole shebang to a builder to start over.