OldShooter
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Using target date funds is a frequent recommendation from folks here. In making such a recommendation, I for one, have been guilty of thinking that all target date funds are similar for a similar target date. Maybe everyone else knew this, but I recently learned that this assumption is wrong. The investment mixes, aka glide paths, vary quite dramatically among fund families.
(from AAII): " A significant difference among the fund families centers on when these target funds finally touch down and become, essentially, income funds. ...
"All of the families offer a retirement income fund for investors who are beyond their “target” dates. However, within the Vanguard target date family, a target date fund’s allocations converge with the asset allocation of the income fund seven years after the target date is reached. Fidelity’s final touchdown is 10 to 15 years after the target date, T. Rowe Price’s is 30 years, and Schwab’s is 15 years."
Here are some links:For my adult-ed investment class I am going to increase emphasis on glide paths, particularly for people who have 401K plans, which typically offer just one family of target date funds. In such a case, a target date fund might be right if the glide path is right, but otherwise the participant may have to make their own target date fund via a changing AA."All of the families offer a retirement income fund for investors who are beyond their “target” dates. However, within the Vanguard target date family, a target date fund’s allocations converge with the asset allocation of the income fund seven years after the target date is reached. Fidelity’s final touchdown is 10 to 15 years after the target date, T. Rowe Price’s is 30 years, and Schwab’s is 15 years."